As a personal injury attorney at SG Legal Group, one of the hardest conversations I have with new clients in slip-and-fall cases is about Maryland’s contributory negligence standard. Many people are shocked to learn that even a small amount of fault on their part can bar them from recovering any compensation.
Clients often come to me assuming that if they were 80% right and the property owner was 20% at fault, they should still be entitled to damages. That may be true in most states, but not in Maryland. Here, the rule is much stricter, and it impacts every premises liability claim.
Maryland is one of only a handful of states that still applies the doctrine of pure contributory negligence. Under this rule, if judge or jury finds that you were even 1% at fault, you cannot recover damages—even if the property owner was 99% at fault.
That means if you slipped on a puddle in a grocery store, but the defense argues you were looking at your phone, or that you should have seen the “wet floor” sign, your entire case may be lost.
In my practice, I see clients struggle to recognize how their own actions could be viewed as partial fault. Something as simple as not watching your step, ignoring a visible hazard, or choosing footwear that might be considered unsafe can be twisted into an argument for contributory negligence. Judges, juries, defense attorneys, and even insurance adjusters apply this doctrine very strictly in Maryland.
That said, contributory negligence does not mean property owners get a free pass. They still have a legal duty to maintain safe premises for lawful visitors. Under Maryland premises liability law, property owners must:
If a property owner fails in these duties, they can still be held liable—provided the injured person did not contribute to the accident.
There are also limited circumstances where contributory negligence may not bar recovery, including:
Because Maryland’s rule is so strict, the evidence we gather in slip-and-fall cases is often decisive. In my experience, the two most persuasive types of evidence are:
Other evidence, like photos taken immediately after the fall, incident reports, and weather records, also plays an important role.
Both commercial and residential property owners in Maryland can be held liable for slip-and-fall injuries, though the context differs.
In both settings, however, contributory negligence remains a powerful defense.
The contributory negligence standard makes Maryland one of the most challenging states for slip-and-fall victims. Insurance adjusters know this, and they use the rule aggressively in negotiations. Defense attorneys will nearly always try to shift some blame to the injured person, no matter how minor.
This means victims must be prepared from the very start to counter arguments of partial fault. Something as small as a statement to an adjuster like “I should have been more careful” can later be used to deny the entire claim.
If you suffer a slip-and-fall injury in Maryland, here’s what I recommend:
Maryland’s contributory negligence rule is one of the toughest hurdles for slip-and-fall victims. Even if the property owner was negligent, your case may be destroyed by a claim that you were 1% at fault. That’s why experienced representation matters.
At SG Legal Group, I carefully investigate these cases to build the strongest possible argument against contributory negligence. My team and I focus on securing surveillance footage, locating witnesses, and holding property owners accountable when they fail to keep their premises safe.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a slip-and-fall accident in Maryland, contact me at SG Legal Group. My team and I will help you understand your options and pursue the compensation you deserve. Call 410-618-1277 or visit our contact page to schedule a consultation.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not legal advice. For advice about your situation, please contact me directly.
Joshua C. Sussex, Esq.
Stay informed with our latest articles and resources.